4.7 Article

Comparative Performance of Five Commercially Available Serologic Assays To Detect Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and Identify Individuals with High Neutralizing Titers

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02257-20

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; serologic assays; neutralizing titers; convalescent plasma

Categories

Funding

  1. Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  2. NIAID [R01AI120938, R01AI120938S1, R01AI128779, R01AI05273, R01AI152078, T32AI102623, UM1-AI068613]
  3. NIH Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance [HHSN272201400007C]
  4. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [K23HL151826, R01HL059842]
  5. National Institute of Drug Abuse [T32DA007292]
  6. Bloomberg Philanthropies
  7. Department of Defense [W911QY2090012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate serological assays are crucial for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, but commercial EIAs may not always accurately detect high nAb titers in individuals, indicating the limitations of current diagnostic methods for COVID-19 convalescent plasma donation.
Accurate serological assays to detect antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to characterize the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify potential candidates for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) donation. This study compared the performances of commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) with respect to detection of IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). The diagnostic accuracy of five commercially available EIAs (Abbott, Euroimmun, EDI, ImmunoDiagnostics, and Roche) for detection of IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated using cross-sectional samples from potential CCP donors who had prior molecular confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 214) and samples from prepandemic emergency department patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 1,099). Of the 214 potential CCP donors, all were sampled >14 days since symptom onset and only a minority (n = 16 [7.5%]) had been hospitalized due to COVID-19; 140 potential CCP donors were tested by all five ElAs and a microneutralization assay. Performed according to the protocols of the manufacturers to detect IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the sensitivity of each EIA ranged from 76.4% to 93.9%, and the specificity of each EIA ranged from 87.0% to 99.6%. Using a nAb titer cutoff value of >= 160 as the reference representing a positive test result (n = 140 CCP donors), the empirical area under the receiver operating curve for each EIA ranged from 0.66 (Roche) to 0.90 (Euroimmun). Commercial EIAs with high diagnostic accuracy to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies did not necessarily have high diagnostic accuracy to detect high nAb titers. Some but not all commercial EIAs may be useful in the identification of individuals with high nAb titers among convalescent individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available