4.8 Article

The role of atomic carbon in directing electrochemical CO(2) reduction to multicarbon products

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 473-482

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ee02826f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0004993, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Fuels from Sunlight Hub [DE-SC0021266]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By combining density functional theory and micro-kinetic modeling, we identified the critical steps for forming C-2 products on copper and elucidated the importance of atomic carbon in guiding C2+ selectivity. We proposed two simple thermodynamic descriptors that effectively determine C2+ selectivity on metal catalysts, providing a clear protocol for screening materials that selectively catalyze CO(2) to C2+ products.
Electrochemical reduction of carbon-dioxide/carbon-monoxide (CO(2)R) to fuels and chemicals presents an attractive approach for sustainable chemical synthesis, but it also poses a serious challenge in catalysis. Understanding the key aspects that guide CO(2)R towards value-added multicarbon (C2+) products is imperative in designing an efficient catalyst. Herein, we identify the critical steps toward C-2 products on copper through a combination of energetics from density functional theory and micro-kinetic modeling. We elucidate the importance of atomic carbon in directing C2+ selectivity and how it introduces surface structural sensitivity on copper catalysts. This insight enables us to propose two simple thermodynamic descriptors that effectively identify C2+ selectivity on metal catalysts beyond copper and hence it defines an intelligible protocol to screen for materials that selectively catalyze CO(2) to C2+ products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available