4.6 Article

Evaluation of Critical Thinking in Online Software Engineering Teaching: A Systematic Mapping Study

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 167015-167026

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135245

Keywords

Software; Software engineering; Training; Systematics; Production; Instruments; Proposals; Critical thinking; online education; software engineering education

Funding

  1. Certicacion de Educador Internacional de Ingenieria (CEII) Programme, Instituto InnovaHiEd
  2. Universidad de La Frontera [DID20-0012, DI21-0016]
  3. Project Innoving 2030 of Universidad Australia
  4. Centro de Estudios en Ingenieria de Software (CEIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Critical thinking is essential in the training of software engineers, enabling the analysis and evaluation of reasoning coherence. A systematic mapping study was conducted to propose a framework for evaluating critical thinking in online teaching due to the lack of specific recommendations in online contexts.
Critical thinking consists in analysing and evaluating the coherence of reasoning. This ability is crucial when we talk about software quality (SQ). SQ is closely related with the engineer's ability to judge and discriminate between solutions correctly, so students are required to analyse, evaluate and draw conclusions. Critical thinking, therefore, becomes a crucial part of the training of software engineers. The problem arises from the diversity of proposals and the lack of rigour in existing experiences, making it difficult to find specific recommendations, especially in online contexts. This article reports a systematic mapping study (SMS), the purpose of which was to detect, organise and characterise specific dimensions in online teaching-learning of critical thinking for software engineering. Based on the results of the SMS, we propose a preliminary framework for the evaluation of critical thinking in the training of software engineers in a context of online higher education. It is expected that this proposal will serve as a basis for instructors of the discipline when evaluating critical thinking in a context of online teaching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available