4.7 Article

Design, synthesis, radiolabeling and in vivo evaluation of potential positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands for brain imaging of the 5-HT7 receptor

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 1736-1750

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.01.016

Keywords

5-HT7 receptor; PET; Radioligand; Arylpiperazine

Funding

  1. Intra European Fellowship [MC-IEF-275329]
  2. Faculty of Health at University of Copenhagen
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. John & Birthe Meyer Foundation
  5. Toyota foundation
  6. Italian Ministry of Health
  7. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Puglia
  8. Lundbeck Foundation [R62-2010-5364, R90-2011-7722] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we describe the design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of a set of compounds structurally related to the high affinity serotonin 5-HT7 receptor agonist N-(4-cyanophenylmethyl)-4-(2-diphenyl)-1-piperazinehexanamide (6, LP-211). Specific structural modifications were performed in order to maintain affinity for the target receptor and to improve the selectivity over 5-HT1A and adrenergic alpha(1) receptors. The synthesized compounds have chemical features that could enable labeling with a positron emitter radioisotope (carbon-11 or fluorine-18) and lipophilicity within the range considered optimal for brain penetration and low non-specific binding. 4-[2-(4-Methoxyphenyl) phenyl]-N-(pyridin-4ylmethyl) piperazinehexanamide (23a) and N-pyridin-4-ylmethyl-3-[4-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl) phenyl] piperazin-1-yl]ethoxy]propanamide (26a) were radiolabeled on the methoxy group with carbon-11. Positron emission tomography (PET) analysis revealed that [C-11]-23a and [C-11]-26a were P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates and rapidly metabolized, resulting in poor brain uptake. These features were not predicted by in vitro tests. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available