4.5 Review

COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages 455-+

Publisher

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.20.276782

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to review misinformation on social media related to COVID-19 during the initial phase of the pandemic. The findings revealed a wide range of misinformation proportions, with some studies not categorizing the type of misinformation while others described specific myths. Some studies also highlighted the negative consequences of COVID-19 misinformation, with fear or panic being a common outcome. Social media's role in disseminating accurate information and misinformation is increasingly prominent, and the insights gained from this review can help health-care organizations better prepare for future infodemics.
Objective To review misinformation related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on social media during the first phase of the pandemic and to discuss ways of countering misinformation. Methods We searched PubMed (R), Scopus, Embase (R), PsycInfo and Google Scholar databases on 5 May 2020 and 1 June 2020 for publications related to COVID-19 and social media which dealt with misinformation and which were primary empirical studies. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the guidelines for using a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews. Evidence quality and the risk of bias of included studies were classified using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation approach. The review is registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42020182154). Findings We identified 22 studies for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis. The proportion of COVID-19 misinformation on social media ranged from 0.2% (413/212 846) to 28.8% (194/673) of posts. Of the 22 studies, 11 did not categorize the type of COVID-19-related misinformation, nine described specific misinformation myths and two reported sarcasm or humour related to COVID-19. Only four studies addressed the possible consequences of COVID-19-related misinformation: all reported that it led to fear or panic. Conclusion Social media play an increasingly important role in spreading both accurate information and misinformation. The findings of this review may help health-care organizations prepare their responses to subsequent phases in the COVID-19 infodemic and to future infodemics in general.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available