4.4 Article

Assessing the quality of support and discovering sources of resilience during COVID-19 measures in people with intellectual disabilities by professional carers

Journal

RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103889

Keywords

Coronavirus; COVID-19; Client communication; Resilience; Intellectual disabilities; Professional carers

Funding

  1. MEE ZHN
  2. VCVGZ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Professional carers used diverse and distal methods to maintain contact with people with intellectual disabilities during COVID-19 measures, and their clients showed high levels of resilience overall.
Background: During COVID-19 measures face-to-face contact is limited and professional carers have to find other ways to support people with intellectual disabilities. COVID-19 measures can increase stress in people with intellectual disabilities, although some people may adapt to or grow from these uncertain situations. Resilience is the process of effectively negotiating, adapting to, or managing significant sources of stress and trauma. The current study aims to provide professional carers with new insights into how they can support people with intellectual disabilities. Method: An online survey was shared through the social media and organizational newsletters of MEE ZHN (a non-governmental organization for people with disabilities). The resilience framework by Ungar (2019) was adapted to fit to people with intellectual disabilities during COVID-19 measures. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS statistics version 26. Results: Results show that professional carers applied diverse and distal methods to maintain contact with people with intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 measures. Professional carers reported a significant decrease in the quality of contact with clients with intellectual disabilities, but overall high levels of resilience in the same clients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available