4.4 Article

The impacts of the World Trade Organization on new members

Journal

WORLD ECONOMY
Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 1944-1972

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/twec.13109

Keywords

gravity model; international trade; World Trade Organization

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used the gravitational model and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood estimator to estimate the impact of the WTO on new member countries from 1995 to 2014. It found that the WTO has promoted trade among new member countries, but the impact has been weak and unevenly distributed between developed and developing countries, as well as across different sectors examined.
In recent years, there has been intense debate on the effects of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) on global trade, triggered by Rose's article (2004) suggesting that the WTO/GATT did not promote world trade at all. In addition, Subramanian and Wei (2007) pointed out a series of asymmetries in trade liberalization led by international organizations. In this paper, we estimate the WTO impact on new members considering both total and disaggregated trade flows from 1995 to 2014 using the gravitational model and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator. The sample includes bilateral imports from 133 countries in the primary, textile, and industrial sectors. This article provides strong evidence that the WTO has promoted new member trade, but weakly and unevenly between developed and developing countries and across sectors examined. Developed countries continued to benefit most from the increase in world trade promoted by the WTO, but more recent liberalization has also brought gains in exports to the group of the least developed countries (LDCs). Furthermore, the gains, although small, are concentrated in primary products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available