3.8 Article

Improving Bone Health by Optimizing the Anabolic Action of Wnt Inhibitor Multitargeting

Journal

JBMR PLUS
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10462

Keywords

BONE ANABOLISM; OSTEOPOROSIS; SCLEROSTIN Dkk1; Wnt

Funding

  1. NIH [AR053237, AR073772, DK075730]
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs [BX001478]
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that combined use of sclerostin antibody and Dkk1 antibody can significantly improve cancellous bone mass, with a 3:1 ratio being the most effective. Targeting multiple antagonists simultaneously in the Wnt pathway can enhance osteoanabolic effects for treating osteoporosis.
Sclerostin antibody (romosozumab) was recently approved for clinical use in the United States to treat osteoporosis. We and others have explored Wnt-based combination therapy to disproportionately improve the anabolic effects of sclerostin inhibition, including cotreatment with sclerostin antibody (Scl-mAb) and Dkk1 antibody (Dkk1-mAb). To determine the optimal ratio of Scl-mAb and Dkk1-mAb for producing maximal anabolic action, the proportion of Scl-mAb and Dkk1-mAb were systematically varied while holding the total antibody dose constant. A 3:1 mixture of Scl-mAb to Dkk1-mAb produced two to three times as much cancellous bone mass as an equivalent dose of Scl-mAb alone. Further, a 75% reduction in the dose of the 3:1 mixture was equally efficacious to a full dose of Scl-mAb in the distal femur metaphysis. The Scl-mAb/Dkk1-mAb combination approach was highly efficacious in the cancellous bone mass, but the cortical compartment was much more subtly affected. The osteoanabolic effects of Wnt pathway targeting can be made more efficient if multiple antagonists are simultaneously targeted. (c) 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available