4.7 Article

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-amino-5-aryl-3-benzylthiopyridine scaffold based potent c-Met inhibitors

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 21, Pages 6804-6820

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.07.032

Keywords

Receptor tyrosine kinase; c-Met; 2-Amino-5-aryl-3-benzylthiopyridine

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB940903, 2012CB518000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20721003, 81025017]
  3. National S&T Major Projects [2012ZX09103-101-072]
  4. National S&T Silver Project [260644]
  5. National Science & Technology Major Project 'Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program' [2012ZX09301001-007]
  6. National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China [2012CB910704]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovation Research Group [81021062]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation [81102461]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of 2-amino-N-benzylpyridine-3-carboxnamides, 2-amino-N-benzylpyridine-3-sulfonamides and 2-amino-3-benzylthiopyridines against c-Met were designed by means of bioisosteric replacement and docking analysis. Optimization of the 2-amino-3-benzylthiopyridine scaffold led to the identification of compound (R)-10b displaying c-Met inhibition with an IC50 up to 7.7 nM. In the cytotoxic evaluation, compound (R)-10b effectively inhibited the proliferation of c-Met addictive human cancer cell lines (IC50 from 0.19 to 0.71 mu M) and c-Met activation-mediated cell metastasis. At a dose of 100 mg/Kg, (R)-10b evidently inhibited tumor growth (45%) in NIH-3T3/TPR-Met xenograft model. Of note, (R)-10b could overcome c-Met-activation mediated gefitinib-resistance, which indicated its potential use for drug combination. Taken together, 2-amino-3-benzylthiopyridine scaffold was first disclosed and exhibited promising pharmacological profiles against c-Met, which left room for further exploration. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available