4.0 Review

The gender paradox: do men differ from women in suicidal behavior?

Journal

JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 22-29

Publisher

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.099

Keywords

Suicide; Gender; Sex; Male; Female

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that inherent differences between male and female suicidal behaviors do exist. The exact association of these differences with inheritance or genetics, as well as whether they relate to sex differences or gender identity, remains unclear. However, it is crucial to acknowledge and address these differences for effective suicide prevention measures.
Is men's suicidal behavior different from that of women's? Much research has been devoted to this question since the late 1980s. Scientific literature refers to it as the Gender Paradox. This term was coined due to the seemingly self-contradictory findings regarding the differences in suicidal behavior between males and females, whereby women attempt suicide more often but more men die by suicide. If there are indeed differences between the sexes, then it is essential to modify the various suicide prevention programs accordingly. This study aimed to investigate whether those differences are real and inherent to the sexes. It attempted to gain a better understanding of the sources of those differences and the reasons behind them by reviewing the available literature on differences between males and females regarding, suicide and suicidal behaviors. The study found that the differences between the sexes regarding suicidal behavior are indeed inherent. Whether these differences associate more with inheritance or genetics is unclear, as is whether they relate to the sex differences or to gender identity. Clearly though, for effective suicide prevention the differences between male and female suicidal behaviors have to be acknowledged, studied separately and prevention and intervention programs have to take these differences into account.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available