Journal
NEW MICROBES AND NEW INFECTIONS
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100931
Keywords
Microbial culture; microbial diversity; phylogenomics; systematics; taxonomy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Currently, less than 20,000 prokaryotic species have been officially named, leaving over 99% of microbial diversity unnamed. The practice of describing each new species in a standardized publication, often a 'single strain species description', hinders the naming progress in the microbial world and contributes to the poor reputation of microbial taxonomy. The authors suggest significant changes in author habits are necessary for improvement.
There are fewer than 20,000 prokaryotic species with validly published names, meaning >99% of a reasonable estimate of microbial diversity remains formally unnamed. Here we explore the damaging consequences of the current practice in which each new species is described in a standardized publication, most typically a 'single strain species description'. This approach is both an impediment to scaling up progress in naming the microbial world and also a significant factor in the poor reputation of the discipline of microbial taxonomy. We conclude that significant changes in author habits are needed and make constructive suggestions as to how author practice should adapt. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available