4.5 Article

PREVALENCE OF DISCOMPLETE SENSORIMOTOR SPINAL CORD INJURY AS EVIDENCED BY NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL METHODS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2774

Keywords

somatosensory evoked potentials; motor evoked potentials; electromyography; sympathetic skin response; laser evoked potentials; spinal cord injury; complete; discomplete

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurophysiological examination revealed that 17% of participants had strong evidence of discomplete spinal cord injury, 39% had possible evidence, and 52% showed subjective sensation of discompleteness during testing. This study suggests potential for sensorimotor functional restoration in some cases of chronic clinically complete spinal cord injury.
Objectives: To assess the prevalence of residual trans-lesion connectivity in persons with chronic clinically complete spinal cord injury (discompleteness) by neurophysiological methods. Participants: A total of 23 adults with chronic sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury, identified through regional registries the regional spinal cord registry of Ostergotland, Sweden. Methods: Diagnosis of clinically complete spinal cord injury was verified by standardized neurological examination. Then, a neurophysiological examination was performed, comprising electroneurography, electromyography, sympathetic skin response and evoked potentials (sensory, laser and motor). Based on this assessment, a composite outcome measure, indicating either strong, possible or no evidence of discomplete spinal cord injury, was formed. Results: Strong neurophysiological evidence of discomplete spinal cord injury was found in 17% (4/23) of participants. If also accepting possible evidence, the discomplete group comprised 39% (9/23). The remaining 61% showed no neurophysiological evidence of discompleteness. However, if also counting reports of subjective sensation elicited during neurophysiological testing in the absence of objective findings, 52% (12/23) showed indication of discomplete spinal cord injury. Conclusion: Evidence of discomplete spinal cord injury can be demonstrated using standard neurophysiological techniques in a substantial subset of individuals with clinically complete spinal cord injury. This study adds to the evidence base indicating the potential of various modes of cross-lesional sensorimotor functional restoration in some cases of chronic clinically complete spinal cord injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available