4.7 Article

17β-Arylsulfonamides of 17β-aminoestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3-ol as highly potent inhibitors of steroid sulfatase

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 1535-1544

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.12.036

Keywords

Steroid sulfatase; Hormone therapy; Enzyme inhibitors; Inhibitors; Steroids; Breast cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steroid sulfatase (STS) catalyzes the desulfation of biologically inactive sulfated steroids to yield biologically active desulfated steroids and is currently being examined as a target for therapeutic intervention for the treatment of breast and other steroid-dependent cancers. Here we report the synthesis of a series of 17 beta-arylsulfonamides of 17 beta-aminoestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3-ol and their evaluation as inhibitors of STS. Some of these compounds are among the most potent reversible STS inhibitors reported to date. Introducing n-alkyl groups into the 4'-position of the 17 beta-benzenesulfonamide derivative resulted in an increase in potency with the n-butyl derivative exhibiting the best potency with an IC50 of 26 nM. A further increase in carbon units (to n-pentyl) resulted in a decrease in potency. Branching of the 4'-n-propyl group resulted in a decrease in potency while branching of the 4'-n-butyl group (to a tert-butyl group) resulted in a slight increase in potency (IC50 = 18 nM). Studies with 30- and 40-substituted substituted 17 beta-benzenesulfonamides with small electron donating and electron withdrawing groups revealed the 3'-bromo and 3'-trifluoromethyl derivatives to be excellent inhibitors with IC50's of 30 and 23 nM, respectively. The 17 beta-2'-naphthalenesulfonamide was also an excellent inhibitor (IC50 = 20 nM) while the 17 beta-4'-phenylbenzenesulfonamide derivative was the most potent inhibitor of all the compounds studied with an IC50 of 9 nM. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available