4.5 Article

A model for predicting stress distribution and strain-force characteristics in regular braided ropes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERED FIBERS AND FABRICS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1558925021990483

Keywords

Braided rope; stress distribution; regular braid; strand; yarn

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905088]
  2. Special Fund of Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation in Jiangsu Province [BA2018061]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232019D3-31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mathematical model for ropes with regular braided structures was developed in this study, revealing that uneven stress distributions in different strands may lead to mechanical failure. Various strand parameters were compared to ensure the reliability of braided ropes in different applications.
Owing to the good mechanical properties of braided structures, regular braided ropes are increasingly being used in various fields, including marine exploration, aloft work, recreation activities, and oil prospecting. However, under certain severe conditions, they could break, a situation that is absolutely undesired. Thus, predicting their stress distribution and strain-force characteristics when they are subjected to different tensile loads is a pre-requisite for their application. Therefore, in this study, a mathematical model for ropes with regular braided structures is developed, and based on the model, this study reveals that uneven stress distributions in the different strands of regular braided ropes generate different stress distributions and strain-force characteristics in each of the strands. Additionally, the uneven stress distributions in the different strands also induce mechanical failure more readily. Finally, to ensure the reliability of braided ropes in different applications, different strand parameters are compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available