4.7 Article

Synthesis and evaluation of cyclic RGD-boron cluster conjugates to develop tumor-selective boron carriers for boron neutron capture therapy

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 1721-1728

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.01.020

Keywords

Integrin alpha v beta 3; Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT); o-Carborane; Cyclic RGD

Funding

  1. Saijiro Endo Memorial Foundation for Science Technology
  2. Japan Science Society [19621]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19590102]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23300348, 19590102] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boron-containing agents play a key role in successful boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Icosahedral boron cluster-Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide conjugates were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for the biodistribution to develop tumor-selective boron carriers. Integrin alpha v beta 3 is an attractive target for antitumor drug delivery because of its specific expression in proliferating endothelial and tumor cells of various origins. We, therefore, selected a c(RGDfK) moiety recognizing alpha v beta 3 as an active tumor-targeting device to conjugate with icosahedral boron-10 clusters, disodium mercaptododecaborate (BSH) or o-carborane as a thermal neutron-sensitizing unit. Preparation of o-carborane derivatives involved microwave irradiation, and resulted in high yields in a short time. An in vitro cell adhesion assay on alpha v beta 3-positive U87MG and SCCVII cells demonstrated the high binding affinity of conjugates to integrin alpha v beta 3 (IC50 = 0.19-2.66 mu M). Biodistribution experiments using SCCVII-bearing mice indicated that GPU-201 showed comparable tumor uptake and a significantly longer retention in tumors compared with BSH. These results suggest that GPU-201 is a promising candidate for use in BNCT. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available