Journal
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 327-334Publisher
MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00104
Keywords
Double First Class; elite university; higher education; nonelite university; Project 211; Project 985
Categories
Funding
- Social Science and Humanities Research Council Canada (SSHRC) [756-2019-0196]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To promote research excellence, the Chinese government has been providing substantial financial support to a small number of selected universities through national research programs. However, admission to these programs may not be purely based on academic merit. Statistical analysis shows that the institutionalized hierarchy in Chinese higher education is not supported by empirical data on research performance, leading to inequalities and inefficiencies. Therefore, China must prioritize meritocracy in the research system to build and sustain research capacity.
To promote research excellence, China's government has been offering substantial financial support for a small group of selected universities through three national research programs (Project 211, Project 985, Double First Class). However, admission to these programs may not be completely merit based. Based on a statistical analysis of Chinese universities' scientific activities, this paper shows that this institutionalized hierarchy is not supported by empirical data on research performance, which contributes to inequalities and inefficiencies in Chinese higher education. To build and maintain research capacity, China must support meritocracy across the research system.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available