4.1 Article

On transitioning from PID to ADRC in thermal power plants

Journal

CONTROL THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 3-18

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s11768-021-00032-4

Keywords

Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC); Proportional-integral-derivative (PID); Thermal processes; Coal-fired power plant; Field applications

Funding

  1. Science & Technology Research Project in Henan Province of China [212102311052]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0901405]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61473265]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the adoption of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) in thermal processes as a viable alternative to proportional-integral-derivative (PID), especially in coal-fired power plants. The discussion includes the interpretation of this paradigm shift, fundamental issues associated with ADRC's applications, and examples of its implementation in various thermal processes. The paper also discusses future research opportunities brought by ADRC's entry as the baseline control technology in thermal processes.
This paper focuses on the recent progress in the adoption of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) in thermal processes as a viable alternative to proportional-integral-derivative (PID), especially in coal-fired power plants. The profound interpretation of this paradigm shift, with backward compatibility, is discussed in detail. A few fundamental issues associated with ADRC's applications in thermal processes are discussed, such as implementation, tuning, and the structural changes. Examples and case studies are presented, encompassing coal-fired power plants, gas turbines and nuclear power plants, as well as highlighting results of field applications. Also discussed are future research opportunities brought by ADRC's entry as the baseline control technology in thermal processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available