4.1 Review

Advanced Electrode Materials in Lithium Batteries: Retrospect and Prospect

Journal

ENERGY MATERIAL ADVANCES
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.34133/2021/1205324

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776019, 21825501, U1801257]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0202500]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [L182021]
  4. Foundation of National Key Laboratory [6142808190201]
  5. Scientific and Technological Key Project of Shanxi Province [20191102003]
  6. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes the historical developments of practical electrode materials in lithium-ion batteries, discusses the emerging electrode materials for next-generation batteries, and presents the future scenario of high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. The combination of theory and experiment under multiscale is highlighted to promote the development of emerging electrode materials.
Lithium- (Li-) ion batteries have revolutionized our daily life towards wireless and clean style, and the demand for batteries with higher energy density and better safety is highly required. The next-generation batteries with innovatory chemistry, material, and engineering breakthroughs are in strong pursuit currently. Herein, the key historical developments of practical electrode materials in Li-ion batteries are summarized as the cornerstone for the innovation of next-generation batteries. In addition, the emerging electrode materials for next-generation batteries are discussed as the revolving challenges and potential strategies. Finally, the future scenario of high-energy-density rechargeable batteries is presented. The combination of theory and experiment under multiscale is highlighted to promote the development of emerging electrode materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available