4.7 Article

Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 37, Pages 3844-3852

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab444

Keywords

Computed tomography coronary angiography; Cost analysis; Fractional flow reserve (FFRCT); Myocardial; Randomized controlled trial; Stable angina; Quality of life

Funding

  1. NIHR Research Professorship [2017-08-ST2007]
  2. NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
  3. NIHR Leicester Clinical Research Facility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The strategy of using CTCA with selective FFRCT in patients with stable angina did not show significant differences in costs or clinical outcomes compared to standard clinical care pathways, but did decrease the usage of invasive coronary angiography.
Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) using computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) determines both the presence of coronary artery disease and vessel-specific ischaemia. We tested whether an evaluation strategy based on FFRCT would improve economic and clinical outcomes compared with standard care. Methods and results Overall, 1400 patients with stable chest pain in 11 centres were randomized to initial testing with CTCA with selective FFRCT (experimental group) or standard clinical care pathways (standard group). The primary endpoint was total cardiac costs at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were angina status, quality of life, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and use of invasive coronary angiography. Randomized groups were similar at baseline. Most patients had an initial CTCA: 439 (63%) in the standard group vs. 674 (96%) in the experimental group, 254 of whom (38%) underwent FFRCT. Mean total cardiac costs were higher by 114 pound (+8%) in the experimental group, with a 95% confidence interval from -112 pound (-8%) to +337 pound (+23%), though the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events did not differ significantly (10.2% in the experimental group vs. 10.6% in the standard group) and angina and quality of life improved to a similar degree over follow-up in both randomized groups. Invasive angiography was reduced significantly in the experimental group (19% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Conclusion A strategy of CTCA with selective FFRCT in patients with stable angina did not differ significantly from standard clinical care pathways in cost or clinical outcomes, but did reduce the use of invasive coronary angiography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available