4.7 Article

Thin-cap fibroatheroma predicts clinical events in diabetic patients with normal fractional flow reserve: the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 45, Pages 4671-4679

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab433

Keywords

Optical coherence tomography; Thin-cap fibroatheroma; Diabetes mellitus; Fractional flow reserve; Vulnerable plaque; Coronary artery disease

Funding

  1. Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, the Netherlands
  2. St Jude Medical/Abbott Vascular

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the impact of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) on clinical outcomes of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions. The results showed that among DM patients with FFR-negative lesions, TCFA-positive patients had a five-fold higher rate of major adverse clinical events (MACE) compared to TCFA-negative patients, suggesting a potential paradigm shift for coronary artery disease risk stratification in DM patients.
Aims The aim of this study was to understand the impact of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) on clinical outcomes of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions. Methods and results COMBINE OCT-FFR study was a prospective, double-blind, international, natural history study. After FFR assessment, and revascularization of FFR-positive lesions, patients with >= 1 FFR-negative lesions (target lesions) were classified in two groups based on the presence or absence of >= 1 TCFA lesion. The primary endpoint compared FFR-negative TCFA-positive patients with FFR-negative TCFA-negative patients for a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization or unstable angina requiring hospitalization at 18 months. Among 550 patients enrolled, 390 (81%) patients had >= 1 FFR-negative lesions. Among FFR-negative patients, 98 (25%) were TCFA positive and 292 (75%) were TCFA negative. The incidence of the primary endpoint was 13.3% and 3.1% in TCFA-positive vs. TCFA-negative groups, respectively (hazard ratio 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-10.89; P < 0.001). The Cox regression multivariable analysis identified TCFA as the strongest predictor of major adverse clinical events (MACE) (hazard ratio 5.12; 95% confidence interval 2.12-12.34; P < 0.001). Conclusions Among DM patients with >= 1 FFR-negative lesions, TCFA-positive patients represented 25% of this population and were associated with a five-fold higher rate of MACE despite the absence of ischaemia. This discrepancy between the impact of vulnerable plaque and ischaemia on future adverse events may represent a paradigm shift for coronary artery disease risk stratification in DM patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available