4.7 Article

Computerized Adaptive Testing for Schizotypal Personality Disorder: Detecting Individuals at Risk

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574760

Keywords

computerized adaptive testing; schizotypal personality disorder; schizotypy; item response theory; assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31960186, 31760288, 31660278]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a computerized adaptive testing for SPD (CAT-SPD) using a non-clinical Chinese sample, demonstrating its reliability, validity, and efficiency in assessing SPD symptoms with reduced test burden and information loss.
As schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) increasingly prevails in the general population, a rapid and comprehensive measurement instrument is imperative to screen individuals at risk for SPD. To address this issue, we aimed to develop a computerized adaptive testing for SPD (CAT-SPD) using a non-clinical Chinese sample (N = 999), consisting of a calibration sample (N-1 = 497) and a validation sample (N-2 = 502). The item pool of SPD was constructed from several widely used SPD scales and statistical analyses based on the item response theory (IRT) via a calibration sample using a graded response model (GRM). Finally, 90 items, which measured at least one symptom of diagnostic criteria of SPD in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and had local independence, good item fit, high slope, and no differential item functioning (DIF), composed the final item pool for the CAT-SPD. In addition, a simulated CAT was conducted in an independent validation sample to assess the performance of the CAT-SPD. Results showed that the CAT-SPD not only had acceptable reliability, validity, and predictive utility but also had shorter but efficient assessment of SPD which can save significant time and reduce the test burden of individuals with less information loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available