4.7 Article

8,8-Dimethyldihydroberberine with improved bioavailability and oral efficacy on obese and diabetic mouse models

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 18, Issue 16, Pages 5915-5924

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.06.085

Keywords

Berberine; Dihydroberberine; Di-Me; AMPK; Diet-induced obese mice; db/db mice

Funding

  1. Chinese National Science Technology [2009ZX09301-001, 2009ZX09102-022]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30925040, 90713046, 30772638,, U0633008]
  3. CAS Foundation [KSCX2-YW-R-168, KSCX2-YW-R-179]
  4. Shanghai Commission of Science and Technology [08DZ2291300, 09DZ2291200, 09431902100]
  5. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program Grant of China [2007AA09Z402, 2007AA02Z147, 2008AA02Z105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical use of the natural alkaloid berberine (BBR) as an antidiabetic reagent is limited by its poor bioavailability. Our previous work demonstrated that dihydroberberine (dhBBR) has enhanced bioavailability and in vivo efficacy compared with berberine. Here we synthesized the 8,8-dimethyldihydroberberine (Di-Me) with improved stability, and bioavailability over dhBBR. Similar to BBR and dhBBR, Di-Me inhibited mitochondria respiration, increased AMP:ATP ratio, activated AMPK and stimulated glucose uptake in L6 myotubes. In diet-induced obese (DIO) mice, Di-Me counteracted the increased adiposity, tissue triglyceride accumulation and insulin resistance, and improved glucose tolerance at a dosage of 15 mg/kg. Administered to db/db mice with a dosage of 50 mg/kg, Di-Me effectively reduced random fed and fasting blood glucose, improved glucose tolerance, alleviated insulin resistance and reduced plasma triglycerides, with better efficacy than dhBBR at the same dosage. Our work highlights the importance of dihydroberberine analogs as potential therapeutic reagents for type 2 diabetes treatment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available