4.7 Article

A faster Fourier transform? Computing small-scale power spectra and bispectra for cosmological simulations in O(N-2) time

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 501, Issue 3, Pages 4004-4034

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3882

Keywords

methods: numerical; methods: statistical; galaxies: statistics; cosmology: theory; cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Herchel-Smith foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces efficient methods for calculating small-scale power spectrum and bispectrum in cosmological simulations, applicable to various tracers and reducing dependence on large random particle catalogues.
We present O(N-2) estimators for the small-scale power spectrum and bispectrum in cosmological simulations. In combination with traditional methods, these allow spectra to be efficiently computed across a vast range of scales, requiring orders of magnitude less computation time than Fast Fourier Transform based approaches alone. These methods are applicable to any tracer; simulation particles, haloes or galaxies, and take advantage of the simple geometry of the box and periodicity to remove almost all dependence on large random particle catalogues. By working in configuration-space, both power spectra and bispectra can be computed via a weighted sum of particle pairs up to some radius, which can be reduced at larger k, leading to algorithms with decreasing complexity on small scales. These do not suffer from aliasing or shot-noise, allowing spectra to be computed to arbitrarily large wavenumbers. The estimators are rigorously derived and tested against simulations, and their covariances discussed. The accompanying code, hipster, has been publicly released, incorporating these algorithms. Such estimators will be of great use in the analysis of large sets of high-resolution simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available