4.6 Article

Association between end-of-life cancer care and immigrant status: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042978

Keywords

adult oncology; adult palliative care; quality in health care

Funding

  1. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute via the Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control [2015-703549]
  2. British Columbia Cancer Agency
  3. ICES - Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada compared recent immigrants and long-term residents in terms of end-of-life cancer care. The study found that immigrants were more likely to receive aggressive care at the end of life compared to long-term residents, while support care varied by ethnicity. Further research is needed to understand contributors to the variations in end-of-life care.
Objective To compare recent immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario, Canada, on established health service quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care. Design Retrospective, population-based cohort study of cancer decedents between 2004 and 2015. Setting Ontario, Canada. Participants We grouped 13 085 immigrants who arrived in Ontario in 1985 or later into eight major ethnic groups based on birth country, mother tongue and surname, and compared them to 229 471 long-term residents who were >= 18 years at the time of death. Primary and secondary outcome measures Aggressive care, defined as a composite of >= 2 emergency department visits, >= 2 new hospitalisations or an intensive care unit admission within 30 days of death; and supportive care, defined as a physician house call within 2 weeks, or palliative nursing or personal support worker home visit within 6 months of death. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between immigration status and the odds of each main outcome. Results Compared with long-term residents, immigrants overall and by ethnic group had higher rates of aggressive care (13.7% vs 17.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Among immigrants, Southeast Asians had the highest use while White-Eastern and Western Europeans had the lowest. Supportive care use was similar between long-term residents and immigrants (50.0% vs 50.5%, respectively; p=0.36), though lower among Southeast Asians (46.6%) and higher among White-Western Europeans (55.6%). After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities, immigrants remained more likely than long-term residents to receive aggressive care (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.21), yet were less likely to receive supportive care (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). Conclusions Among cancer decedents in Ontario, immigrants are more likely to use aggressive healthcare services at the end of life than long-term residents, while supportive care varies by ethnicity. Contributors to variation in end-of-life care require further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available