4.7 Article

Calmodulin inhibitors from the fungus Emericella sp.

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 2167-2174

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.10.079

Keywords

Emericella; 15-Chlorotajixanthone hydrate; 14-Methoxytajixanthone; Shamixanthone; Tajixanthone hydrate; Calmodulin; Docking

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [45814-Q]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new xanthones identified as 15-chlorotajixanthone hydrate (1) and 14-methoxytajixanthone (2) were isolated from an Emericella sp. strain 25379 along with shamixanthone (3) and tajixanthone hydrate (4). The stereostructures of 1 and 2 were elucidated by spectroscopic and molecular modeling methods. The absolute configuration at the stereogenic centers of 1 was established according to CD measurements. In the case of 2, however, the absolute con. guration at C-20 and C-25 was designated as S and R, respectively, by Mosher ester methodology. Thereafter, the con. guration at C-14 and C-15 of 2 was established as S and S, respectively by comparing the optical rotation and H-1-H-1 coupling constant experimental values with those obtained through molecular modeling calculations at DFT B3LYP/DGDZVP level of theory for diasteroisomers 2a-2d. The activation of the calmodulin-sensitive cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE1) was inhibited in the presence of 1-4 in a concentration-dependent manner. The effect of compounds 2 (IC50 = 5.54 mu M) and 4 (IC50 = 5.62 mu M) was comparable with that of chlorpromazine (CPZ; IC50 = 7.26 mu M), a well known CaM inhibitor used as a positive control. The inhibition mechanism of both compounds was competitive with respect to CaM according to a kinetic study. A docking analysis with 2 and 4 using the AutoDock 4.0 program revealed that they interacted with CaM in the same pocket as trifluoropiperazine (TFP). (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available