4.6 Article

Base Excision Repair in the Mitochondria

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 116, Issue 8, Pages 1490-1499

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25103

Keywords

REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; BASE EXCISION REPAIR; DNA GLYCOSYLASES; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA DAMAGE AND RESPONSE; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DYSFUNCTION

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 CA098993, 1K99ES024417]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA098993] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [K99ES024417] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 16.5kb human mitochondrial genome encodes for 13 polypeptides, 22 tRNAs and 2 rRNAs involved in oxidative phosphorylation. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), unlike its nuclear counterpart, is not packaged into nucleosomes and is more prone to the adverse effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during oxidative phosphorylation. The past few decades have witnessed an increase in the number of proteins observed to translocate to the mitochondria for the purposes of mitochondrial genome maintenance. The mtDNA damage produced by ROS, if not properly repaired, leads to instability and can ultimately manifest in mitochondrial dysfunction and disease. The base excision repair (BER) pathway is employed for the removal and consequently the repair of deaminated, oxidized, and alkylated DNA bases. Specialized enzymes called DNA glycosylases, which locate and cleave the damaged base, catalyze the first step of this highly coordinated repair pathway. This review focuses on members of the four human BER DNA glycosylase superfamilies and their subcellular localization in the mitochondria and/or the nucleus, as well as summarizes their structural features, biochemical properties, and functional role in the excision of damaged bases. J. Cell. Biochem. 116: 1490-1499, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available