4.8 Article

Patterns of collaboration in mHealth: A network analysis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121366

Keywords

Mobile health; Public-private networks; Social network analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of mobile phones in healthcare presents unique opportunities, but the lack of evidence and funding has hampered the scaling up of mHealth projects. Public-private networks may offer successful innovation, with projects involving local partners and a diverse range of organizations more likely to survive. Initiatives targeting communicable diseases in lower-income economies are less likely to succeed.
The use of mobile phones offers unique opportunities for information exchange and service provision within healthcare. Yet mHealth has historically been dominated by small scale, isolated initiatives. The main obstacle to scaling up mHealth projects is a lack of evidence on their performance, preventing the projects from receiving additional funding and limiting the scope for the development of best practices. In this context, an interesting potential form of successful innovation is the emergence of public-private networks. Despite sector fragmentation, there exists a network of public and private actors that could serve as a vehicle for knowledge sharing which is worth being examined. Through analysis of a sample of 196 projects involving 384 organizations, this study investigates patterns of collaboration within the mHealth ecosystem to capture the main trends in the structure and scope of the partnerships and examines the variables associated to project survival. Results show that projects implemented by at least one local partner are more likely to survive, as well as projects that involve a set of diverse (for-profit and not-for profit) organizations. Furthermore, the initiatives targeting communicable diseases, which are typically implemented in lower-income economies, are less likely to succeed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available