4.6 Article

Learning the Quality of Machine Permutations in Job Shop Scheduling

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 99541-99552

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3207559

Keywords

Supervised learning; Metaheuristics; Job shop scheduling; Deep learning; Recurrent neural networks; Machine learning; Deep learning; job shop scheduling; metaheuristic; recurrent neural network; scheduling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the optimization community has shown increasing interest in leveraging Machine Learning (ML) to enhance algorithm design. Research focusing on using ML to predict the quality of machine permutations has led to improvements in the performance of algorithms like Tabu Search, showcasing the value of such predictive modeling techniques.
In recent years, the power demonstrated by Machine Learning (ML) has increasingly attracted the interest of the optimization community that is starting to leverage ML for enhancing and automating the design of algorithms. One combinatorial optimization problem recently tackled with ML is the Job Shop scheduling Problem (JSP). Most of the works on the JSP using ML focus on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), and only a few of them leverage supervised learning techniques. The recurrent reasons for avoiding supervised learning seem to be the difficulty in casting the right learning task, i.e., what is meaningful to predict, and how to obtain labels. Therefore, we first propose a novel supervised learning task that aims at predicting the quality of machine permutations. Then, we design an original methodology to estimate this quality, and we use these estimations to create an accurate sequential deep learning model (binary accuracy above 95%). Finally, we empirically demonstrate the value of predicting the quality of machine permutations by enhancing the performance of a simple Tabu Search algorithm inspired by the works in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available