3.9 Article

Blood-brain barrier dysfunction and reduced cerebrospinal fluid levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein-beta in patients with subcortical small-vessel disease

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12296

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid beta; blood-brain barrier; cerebrospinal fluid; subcortical small-vessel disease

Funding

  1. Swedish government
  2. Swedish county councils
  3. ALF agreement [ALFGBG-724331, ALFGBG-722371, ALFGBG-720931, ALFGBG-715986, ALFGBG-720661]
  4. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation
  5. Demensfonden, Sweden
  6. Gun & Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse, Sweden
  7. Stiftelsen for Gamla Tjanarinnor, Sweden
  8. Gunvor och Josef Aners stiftelse, Sweden
  9. Formas, a Swedish government research council
  10. Hedlunds stiftelse, Sweden
  11. Stiftelsen Hjalmar Svenssons Forskningsfond, Sweden
  12. Stiftelsen Langmanska kulturfonden, Sweden
  13. Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse, Sweden
  14. Stiftelsen Psykiatriska Forskningsfonden, Sweden
  15. Royal Society of Arts and Sciences in Gothenburg, Sweden
  16. Sweden's innovation agency Vinnova
  17. Wenner-Gren Foundations, Sweden
  18. Wilhelm & Martina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond, Sweden
  19. Ahlenstiftelsen, Sweden
  20. Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse, Sweden
  21. Swedish Research Council [2018-02532, 2017-00915]
  22. European Research Council [681712]
  23. Alzheimer DrugDiscovery Foundation (ADDF), USA [201809-2016862]
  24. AD Strategic Fund
  25. Alzheimer's Association [ADSF-21-831376-C, ADSF-21-831381-C, ADSF-21-831377-C]
  26. Olav Thon Foundation
  27. Erling-Persson Family Foundation
  28. Stiftelsen for Gamla Tjanarinnor
  29. Hjarnfonden, Sweden [FO2019-0228, FO2017-0243]
  30. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [860197]
  31. UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL
  32. Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA [RDAPB-201809-2016615]
  33. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation [AF-742881]
  34. European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders [JPND2019-466-236]
  35. National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA [1R01AG068398-01]
  36. Alzheimer's Association 2021 Zenith Award [ZEN-21-848495]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SSVD patients exhibit distinct biomarker profiles from AD and mixed AD/SSVD, with lower sAPP-β levels and blood-brain barrier dysfunction suggesting possible diagnostic tools for SSVD.
Introduction Subcortical small-vessel disease (SSVD) is the most common vascular cognitive disorder. However, because no disease-specific cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are available for SSVD, our aim was to identify such markers. Methods We included 170 healthy controls and patients from the Gothenburg Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) study clinically diagnosed with SSVD dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), or mixed AD/SSVD. We quantified CSF levels of amyloid-beta (A beta)(x-38), A beta(x-40), A beta(x-42), as well as soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP)-alpha and sAPP-beta. Results sAPP-beta was lower in SSVD patients than in AD patients and controls. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that sAPP-beta moderately separated SSVD from AD and controls. Moreover, the CSF/serum albumin ratio was elevated exclusively in SSVD and could moderately separate SSVD from the other groups in ROC analyses. Discussion SSVD has a biomarker profile that differs from that of AD and controls, and to some extent also from mixed AD/SSVD, suggesting that signs of blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and sAPP-beta could be additional tools to diagnose SSVD. Highlights Patients with subcortical small-vessel disease (SSVD) exhibited reduced levels of sAPP-beta and disturbances of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This biochemical pattern is different from that of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to some degree from that of mixed AD/SSVD. Our findings are speaking in favor of the concept that SSVD is a distinct vascular cognitive disorder (VCD) form.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available