4.1 Review

Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Strategies for Morphology Control in Polymer-Based Biomedical Materials

Journal

ADVANCED NANOBIOMED RESEARCH
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anbr.202100087

Keywords

biomaterials; drug delivery; nanofabrication; polymers; self-assembly

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [754490]
  2. National Science Foundation [175220]
  3. School of Polymer Science and Engineering at the University for Southern Mississippi
  4. College of Arts and Sciences at the University for Southern Mississippi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The size and shape of polymer materials are increasingly important in scientific fields, with new synthetic methods allowing for the fabrication of anisotropic and shape-defined nanomaterials. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches can produce polymer particles with precise dimensions and unique shapes.
The size and shape of polymer materials is becoming an increasingly important property in accessing new functions and applications of nano-/microparticles in many scientific fields. New synthetic methods have allowed unprecedented capability for the facile fabrication of anisotropic and shape-defined nanomaterials. Bottom-up approaches including: emulsion polymerization techniques, amphiphile self-assembly, and polymerization-induced self-assembly, can lead to polymer particles with precise dimensions in the nanoscale. Top-down methods such as lithographic templating, and 3D printing, have increased the access to unique particle shapes. In this review, these recent developments are appraised and contrasted, with future research directions providing that focus on biomedical applications. Finally, the opportunity available for synergistic combinations of top-down and bottom-up fabrication approaches in realizing previously unattainable architectures and material properties is highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available