The relations of reflective and intuitive thinking styles with task performance: Ameta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the relations of individual differences in reflective (or rational) and intuitive thinking styles with workplace task performance. We meta-analyzed 113 effect sizes from 71 independent samples (N = 11,713). Results indicate that reflective thinking style has a positive and non-zero meta-analytic relation with task performance (rho =.213). This positive relation is stronger in environments characterized by higher task complexity, greater importance of creativity and innovation for work tasks, and higher time pressure associated with work tasks. Intuitive thinking style, conversely, has a very small but positive meta-analytic relation with task performance (rho =.051), and this relation is stronger in environments characterized by higher task complexity. Finally, incremental validity analyses reveal that reflective thinking style explains unique variance in task performance, beyond conscientiousness and intelligence (general mental ability). Overall, this meta-analysis demonstrates that reflective thinking style is an important antecedent to task performance.

Automated summary

This meta-analysis found that reflective thinking style has a positive relationship with task performance, particularly in environments with high task complexity, high demand for innovation, and high work time pressure. In contrast, intuitive thinking style, although positively related to task performance, has a smaller impact, with a more pronounced relationship in environments with high task complexity. Additionally, reflective thinking style can explain unique variance in task performance.