4.2 Review

The evolution and function of the PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR gene family in the plant circadian clock

Journal

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SOC BRASIL GENETICA
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0137

Keywords

Circadian clock; circadian rhythms; pseudo-response regulators; core oscillator; gene evolution

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [19/08534-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PRRs are a crucial gene family involved in the generation of rhythms by the circadian clock, playing roles in various aspects through diverse protein-protein interactions. The diversity of PRR genes in plants and their mechanisms in the circadian clock have been extensively researched.
PSEUDO-RESPONSE PROTEINS (PRRs) are a gene family vital for the generation of rhythms by the circadian clock. Plants have circadian clocks, or circadian oscillators, to adapt to a rhythmic environment. The circadian clock system can be divided into three parts: the core oscillator, the input pathways, and the output pathways. The PRRs have a role in all three parts. These nuclear proteins have an N-terminal pseudo receiver domain and a C-terminal CONSTANS, CONSTANS-LIKE, and TOC1 (CCT) domain. The PRRs can be identified from green algae to monocots, ranging from one to >5 genes per species. Arabidopsis thaliana, for example, has five genes: PRR9, PRR7, PRR5, PRR3 and TOC1/PRR1. The PRR genes can be divided into three clades using protein homology: TOC1/PRR1, PRR7/3, and PRR9/5 expanded independently in eudicots and monocots. The PRRs can make protein complexes and bind to DNA, and the wide variety of protein-protein interactions are essential for the multiple roles in the circadian clock. In this review, the history of PRR research is briefly recapitulated, and the diversity of PRR genes in green and recent works about their role in the circadian clock are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available