4.8 Article

Toward the Threshold of Radiation Hazards of U in Chinese Coal through the CART Algorithm

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 1864-1874

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07776

Keywords

naturally occurring radioactive materials; coal combustion residues; radiation hazard; building materials; classification and regression tree

Funding

  1. National Key National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC2902000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772320]
  3. 111 Projects [B17042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential harm of naturally occurring radioactive materials in coal combustion residues to humans depends on the U content and ash yield in coal. The threshold of U content in coal varies depending on the ash yield levels.
The high volume of coal used for combustion usually leads to a large amount of coal combustion residues (CCRs), which contain the naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) decayed from U and Th in coals. The high radioactivity of NORMs can cause potential harm to humans if the CCRs are used as building materials. The activities of CCRs not only depend on the concentrations of radionuclides but also largely depend on the variations of ash yields of coal. On the other hand, ash yields significantly vary in coal from less than 1-50%. This indicates that similar concentrations of radionuclides in coal with different ash yields generally do not result in similar activities in CCRs. Therefore, it is significant to build a threshold of U in coals with different ash yield levels. In this research, based on the data of 945 coal samples from China and the selected optimal model using the classification and regression tree algorithm, the threshold of U for the radiation hazard is determined to be 7.98 mg/kg for coals with ash yields higher than 20%, while the threshold of U for the radiation hazard is 5.28 mg/kg for coals with ash yields lower than 20%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available