4.7 Article

Numerically exact simulations of a quantum Carnot cycle: Analysis using thermodynamic work diagrams

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 157, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0107305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [B21H01884]
  2. JST, the establishment of university fellowships toward the creation of science technology innovation [JPMJFS2123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the efficiency of a quantum Carnot engine based on open quantum dynamics theory. By numerical simulations and thermodynamic analysis, it is found that the maximum efficiency is determined solely by the bath temperatures, in line with Carnot's theorem.
We investigate the efficiency of a quantum Carnot engine based on open quantum dynamics theory. The model includes time-dependent external fields for the subsystems controlling the isothermal and isentropic processes and for the system-bath (SB) interactions controlling the transition between these processes. Numerical simulations are conducted in a nonperturbative and non-Markovian SB coupling regime by using the hierarchical equations of motion under these fields at different cycle frequencies. The work applied to the total system and the heat exchanged with the baths are rigorously evaluated. In addition, by regarding quasi-static work as free energy, we compute the quantum thermodynamic variables and analyze the simulation results by using thermodynamic work diagrams for the first time. Analysis of these diagrams indicates that, in the strong SB coupling region, the fields for the SB interactions are major sources of work, while in other regions, the field for the subsystem is a source of work. We find that the maximum efficiency is achieved in the quasi-static case and is determined solely by the bath temperatures, regardless of the SB coupling strength, which is a numerical manifestation of Carnot's theorem. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available