4.5 Article

Association of vitamin D3 with alveolar bone regeneration in dogs

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1208-1217

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12460

Keywords

alloplast; bone regeneration; calcitriol; cholecalciferol; vitamin D-3; ridge preservation

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [102-2314-B-182A-041]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRP 370291, 392071, 3A1141, 3A1142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Designed sockets prepared on the mandibles of nine Beagle dogs were divided into three groups: Calcitriol +Alloplast, Alloplast and Empty. Five of the nine dogs received Vit.D-3 and calcium supplement (Vit.D/Ca group), while the other four dogs without supplements were assigned to Non-Vit.D/Ca group. After 4weeks, the extent of vertical ridge resorption (VRR), bone density (density), new bone formation (NBF) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. Following systemic Vit.D/Ca administration, the Empty subgroup showed significant differences from the Calcitriol + Alloplast subgroup on variants NBF/Density/VRR and the Alloplast subgroup on items NBF/Density/ISQ/VRR. Alternatively, the Calcitriol + Alloplast subgroup revealed higher values of NBF/Density/ISQ (P<0.001) and a lower VRR value (P=0.001) than the Alloplast subgroup. Although there were no significant differences in NBF (P=0.349), density (P=0.796), ISQ (P=0.577) and VRR (0.979) comparisons on alloplast treatment between the Vit.D/Ca and Non-Vit.D/Ca groups, local application with Calcitriol + Alloplast demonstrated better NBF/Density/ISQ (P=0.02 to <0.001) effects than which of Alloplast subgroups. Consequently, the results showed that both systemic and local vitamin D-3 treatment might accelerate bone regeneration in dogs. Within the using dose, systemic vitamin D-3 treatment displayed a superior stimulating effect than local vitamin D-3 application did.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available