4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Integration of Ranked Lists via Cross Entropy Monte Carlo with Applications to mRNA and microRNA Studies

Journal

BIOMETRICS
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 9-18

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01044.x

Keywords

Combinatorial; Data integration; Kullback-Leibler measure; Importance sampling; Optimization criterion; Prostate cancer; Target prediction

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG002657] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the major challenges facing researchers studying complex biological systems is integration of data from-omics platforms. Omic-scale data include DNA variations, transcriptom profiles, and RAomics. Selection of an appropriate approach for a data-integration task is problem dependent, primarily dictated by the information contained in the data. In situations where modeling of multiple raw datasets jointly might be extremely challenging due to their vast differences, rankings from each dataset would provide a commonality based on which results could be integrated. Aggregation of microRNA targets predicted from different computational algorithms is such a problem. Integration of results from multiple mRNA studies based on different platforms is another example that will be discussed. Formulating the problem of integrating ranked lists as minimizing an objective criterion, we explore the usage of a cross entropy Monte Carlo method for solving such a combinatorial problem. Instead of placing a discrete uniform distribution on all the potential solutions, an iterative importance sampling technique is utilized to slowly tighten the net to place most distributional mass on the optimal solution and its neighbors. Extensive simulation studies were performed to assess the performance of the method. With satisfactory simulation results, the method was applied to the microRNA and mRNA problems to illustrate its utility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available