4.7 Article

The core density of dark matter halos: A critical challenge to the ACDM paradigm?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 528, Issue 2, Pages 607-611

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1086/308225

Keywords

cosmology : theory; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; methods : n-body simulations; methods : numerical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compare the central mass concentration of cold dark matter (CDM) halos found in cosmological N-body simulations with constraints derived from the Milky Way disk dynamics and from the Tully-Fisher relation. For currently favored values of the cosmological parameters (Omega(0) similar to 0.3; Lambda(0) = 1 - Omega(0) similar to 0.7, h similar to 0.7; COBE- and cluster abundance-normalized a,; big bang nucleosynthesis Omega(b)), we find that halos with circular velocities comparable to the rotation speed of the Galaxy have typically 3 times more dark matter inside the solar circle than inferred from observations of Galactic dynamics. Such high central concentrations of dark matter on the scale of galaxy disks also imply that stellar mass-to-light ratios much lower than expected from population synthesis models must be assumed in order to reproduce the zero point of the Tully-Fisher relation. Indeed, even under the extreme assumption that all baryons in a dark halo are turned into stars, disks with conventional I-band stellar mass-to-light ratios [M/L-I similar to 2 +/- 1(M/L-I).] are about 2 mag fainter than observed at a given rotation speed. We examine several modifications to the Lambda CDM model that may account for these discrepancies and conclude that agreement can only be accomplished at the expense of renouncing other major successes of the model. Reproducing the observed properties of disk galaxies thus appears to demand substantial revision to the currently most successful model of structure formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available