4.7 Article

Effect of interferon β-1b in MS -: Assessment of annual accumulation of PD/T2 activity on MRI

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 200-206

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.54.1.200

Keywords

MS; MRI; interferon beta 1b; lesion activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether the efficacy of interferon beta-1b (IFN beta-1b) on lesion activity could be shown with annual analysis of MRI. Background: Clinical outcomes and MRI burden of disease changes in MS patients in a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled 5-year trial of IFN beta-1b have been reported, together with an analysis of 6-weekly MRI activity in a small subgroup during 2 years. MRI activity measurements based on annual scans have not been documented. Methods: Patients were randomized into three treatment arms: placebo, 1.6 mIU, and 8 mIU IFN beta-1b self-administered subcutaneously every other day. Active lesions were identified as new, enlarging, or recurrent on proton density and T2-weighted MRI scans. Gadolinium was not used. An annual accumulation activity index was developed as an additional analysis of lesion activity. Results: During the 5 years, both high- and low-dose IFN beta-1b groups showed a striking reduction in lesion annual accumulation activity on the activity index versus placebo (p = 0.001). Thirty-five percent of the high-dose patients and 29% of the low-dose patients were MRI inactive by this method of analysis, whereas only 16% of placebo patients were inactive (p = 0.001, placebo versus 8 mIU). Conclusions: This analysis of the annual accumulation of lesion activity shows that the previously reported treatment effect seen on MRI scanning once every 6 weeks in a subcohort of the patients can also be seen on yearly scans. This annual accumulation activity analysis provides an independent MRI confirmation of a treatment and dose effect for IFN beta-1b.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available