4.6 Article

Contribution of individual amino acids within MHC molecule or antigenic peptide to TCR ligand potency

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 164, Issue 2, Pages 861-871

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.2.861

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The TCR recognition of peptides bound to MHC class' II molecules is highly flexible in some T cells. Although progress has been made in understanding the interactions within the trimolecular complex, to what extent the individual components and their amino acid composition contribute to ligand recognition by individual T cells is not completely understood. We investigated how single amino acid residues influence Ag recognition of T cells by combining several experimental approaches. We defined TCR moths for CD4(+) T cells using peptide synthetic combinatorial libraries in the positional scanning format (PS-SCL) and single amino acid-modified peptide analogues, The similarity of the TCR moths defined by both methods and the identification of stimulatory antigenic peptides by the PS-SCL approach argue for a contribution of each amino acid residue to the overall potency of the antigenic peptide ligand, In some instances, however, moths are formed by adjacent amino acids, and their combined influence is superimposed on the overall contribution of each amino acid within the peptide epitope, In contrast to the flexibility of the TCR to interact with different peptides, recognition was very sensitive toward modifications of the MBC-restriction element, Exchanges of just one amino acid of the MHC molecule drastically reduced the number of peptides recognized. The results indicate that a specific MHC molecule not only selects certain peptides, but also is crucial for setting an affinity threshold for TCR recognition, which determines the flexibility in peptide recognition for a given TCR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available