4.0 Article

Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 320, Issue 7228, Pages 155-159

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7228.155

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To compare the effectiveness of touch screen system with information leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests. Design Randomised controlled trial; participants allocated to intervention group (given access to touch screen and leaflet information) or control group (leaflet information only). Setting Antenatal clinic in university teaching hospital. Subjects 875 women booking antenatal care. Interventions All participants received a leaflet providing information on prenatal tests. Women in the intervention arm also had access to touch screen information system in antenatal clinic. Main outcome measures Women's informed decision making on prenatal testing as measured by their uptake of and understanding of the purpose of specific tests; their satisfaction with information provided; and their levels of anxiety. Results All women in the trial had a good baseline knowledge of prenatal tests. Women in the intervention group did not show any greater understanding of the purpose of the tests than control women. However, uptake of detailed anomaly scans was significantly higher in intervention group lan the control group (94% (351/375)v 87% (310/358), P = 0.0014). Levels of anxiety among nulliparous women in intervention group declined significantly over time (P < 0.001). Conclusions The touch screen seemed to convey no benefit over well prepared leaflets in improving understanding of prenatal tests among the pregnant women. It did, however, seem to reduce levels of anxiety and may be most effective for providing information to selected women who have a relevant adverse history or abnormal results from tests in their current pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available