4.7 Article

Nitric oxide stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, Src kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinases in murine fibroblasts

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 174-182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00233-6

Keywords

nitric oxide; tyrosine phosphorylation; focal adhesion kinase; redox signalling; MAP kinase; Src kinase; free radicals

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ESO3425] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) can participate in cellular signaling. In this study, monoclonal antibodies against proteins from the growth factor-mediated signalling pathway were used to identify a set of 126-, 56-, 43-, and 30-kDa. proteins phosphorylated on tyrosine at NO stimulation of murine fibroblasts overexpressing the human epidermal growth factor receptor. The band corresponding to the 126-kDa protein was FAK. The 56-kDa protein was Src kinase, and the doubler 43- and 40-kDa protein corresponded to the extracellular-regulated MAP kinases (ERK1/ERK2). The effects of NO on focal adhesion complexes were also investigated. FAK was constitutively associated with the: adapter protein Grb2 in HER14 cells. Treatment of the cells with the NO donor, sodium nitroprusside, or with EGF did not change this association. We also detected a basal constitutive association of Src kinase with FAK in HER14 cells. In NO-treated cells, this association was stimulated. The doublet 43/40-kDa protein was identical to the ERK1/ERK2 MAP kinases. NO stimulated an increase in ERK1/ERK2 phosphorylation as assessed by a shift in its electrophoretic mobility and by increased phosphotyrosine immunoreactivity. Furthermore, NO-dependent activation of ERK1/ERK2 depended on the intracellular redox status. Inhibition of glutathione synthesis was necessary to promote activation of the kinases. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available