4.3 Article

The effect of formalin fixation on the levels of brain transition metals in archived samples

Journal

BIOMETALS
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1123-1127

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10534-010-9359-4

Keywords

Transition metals; Formalin; Fixation; Alzheimer's disease; Leaching

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG20948]
  2. Daljit S. and Elaine Sarkaria Chair in Diagnostic Medicine
  3. [P01 AG12435]
  4. [P50 AG16570]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reports that iron, zinc and copper homeostasis are in aberrant homeostasis are common for various neurodegenerative diseases, particularly for Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Manipulating the levels of these elements in the brain through the application of chelators has been and continues to be tested therapeutically in clinical trials with mixed results. Much of the data indicating that these metals are abnormally concentrated in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease brain tissue was generated through the analysis of post-mortem human tissue which was archived in formalin. In this study, we evaluated the effect of formalin fixation of brain on the levels of three important transition metals (iron, copper, and zinc) by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Paired brain specimens were obtained at autopsy for each case; one was conserved by formalin archival (averaging four years), the other was rapidly frozen. Both white and grey matter samples were analyzed and the concentrations of iron and zinc were found to decrease with fixation. Iron was reduced by 40% (P < 0.01), and zinc by 77% (P < 0.0001); copper concentrations increased by 37% (P < 0.05) by the paired T-test. The increase in copper is likely due to contamination from trace copper in the formalin. These results indicate that transition metal data obtained from fixed tissue may be heavily distorted and care should be taken in interpreting this data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available