3.8 Article

Isolation and characterization of adult microglial cells and oligodendrocytes derived from postmortem human brain tissue

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH PROTOCOLS
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 85-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1385-299X(99)00059-8

Keywords

human adult microglial cells; immunocytochemistry; class II major histocompatibility complex antigen; oligodendrocytes; phagocytosis; proliferation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study provides a detailed description of the simultaneous establishment and immunocytochemical characterization of highly enriched human adult microglial cell cultures as well as of oligodendrocyte cultures. For this study, brain tissue specimens were collected at autopsy with relatively short postmortem times (3-9 h) from various regions of the CNS of Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease and non-demented control cases. Although methods to isolate viable glial cells from human adult brain tissue have been described, these human brain specimens were often derived from surgical resections, i.e., in order to treat intractable epilepsy, brain tumors or cardiovascular diseases involving the brain. However, for the study of many neurological disorders, surgical material is not available. Furthermore, for obvious reasons, there is a limit to the number of central nervous system (CNS) regions from which (enough) tissue can be obtained at surgery. The adherent primary microglial cells, isolated according to the here described procedures consisted of proliferating, phagocytotic cells that expressed various microglia/macrophage-specific markers as judged by immunocytochemical analysis. Non-adherent cells isolated from the same brain tissue samples expressed oligodendrocyte-specific markers. The current described culture system may provide a valuable tool in studying human CNS biology and disease. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available