4.8 Article

Paradoxical inhibition of T-cell function in response to CTLA-4 blockade; heterogeneity within the human T-cell population

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 211-214

Publisher

NATURE AMERICA INC
DOI: 10.1038/72323

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01DK52127] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01NS2424710A2] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [IPO1A139671-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T-cell co-stimulation delivered by the molecules B7-1 or B7-2 through CD28 has a positive effect on T-cell activation(1), whereas engagement of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) by these molecules inhibits activation(2). In vivo administration to mice of blocking monoclonal antibodies or Fab fragments against CTLA-4 can augment antigen-specific T-cell responses(3,4) and, thus, therapy with monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4 has potential applications for tumor therapy and enhancement of vaccine immunization(5-7). The effects of B7-1 and B7-2 co-stimulation through CD28 depend on the strength of the signal delivered through the T-cell receptor (TCR)(8,9) and the activation state of T cells during activation(10,11). Thus, we sought to determine whether these factors similarly influence the effect of B7-mediated signals delivered through CTLA-4 during T-cell activation. Using freshly isolated human T cells and Fab fragments of a monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4 we demonstrate here that CTLA-4 blockade can enhance or inhibit the clonal expansion of different T cells that respond to the same antigen, depending on both the T-cell activation state and the strength of the T-cell receptor signal delivered during T-cell stimulation. Thus, for whole T-cell populations, blocking a negative signal may paradoxically inhibit immune responses. These results provide a theoretical framework for clinical trials in which co-stimulatory signals are manipulated in an attempt to modulate the immune response in human disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available