4.2 Article

Effect of case managers with a general medical patient population

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 23-29

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00215.x

Keywords

case management; discharge planning; general medicine; length of stay; patient satisfaction; prediction rule

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of inpatient case management (CM) on a general medical service and to determine if a prediction rule, identifying patients likely to need discharge planning services, could define a subset of patients for whom CM would be most effective. We hypothesized that CM would have greatest impact on patients predicted to be at highest risk of needing discharge planning to arrange for post-discharge medical services. We carried out a prospective controlled study. Six general medicine teams from a 600-bed urban teaching hospital were randomly assigned to CM (n = 4) or standard care (SC) (n = 2). Number of patients = 302 (207 CM; 95 SC), Case managers participated in daily physician team rounds and coordinated discharge planning for CM patients; SC patients received discharge planning from staff nurses or discharge planners when requested by physicians. The outcomes measured were deviation from the hospital length of stay (LOS) expected for a patient's diagnosis, patient satisfaction and non-acute medical service utilization during the month after discharge. Overall, patients from CM and SC teams did not differ in their deviation from expected LOS, post-discharge medical service utilization and patient satisfaction. However, after stratifying patients by their predicted need for post-discharge medical services, only patients in the 'high risk' category had a significantly shorter LOS under CM (2.9 days shorter than SC patients; P = 0.02). We concluded that, in this study, the effect of case managers on a general medical service was limited to shortening LOS only among a stratum of high risk patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available