4.7 Article

Derived distribution of floods based on the concept of partial area coverage with a climatic appeal

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 469-482

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/1999WR900287

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new rationale for deriving the probability distribution of floods and help in understanding the physical processes underlying the distribution itself is presented. On the basis of this a model that presents a number of new assumptions is developed. The basic ideas are as follows: (1) The peak direct streamflow Q can always be expressed as the product of two random variates, namely, the average runoff per unit area u(a) and the peak contributing area a; (2) the distribution of u(a) conditional on a can be related to that of the rainfall depth occurring in a duration equal to a characteristic response time tau(a) of the contributing part of the basin; and (3) tau(a) is assumed to vary with a according to a power law. Consequently, the probability density function of Q can be found as the integral, over the total basin area A, of that of a times the density function of u(a) given a. It is suggested that u(a) can be expressed as a fraction of the excess rainfall and that the annual flood distribution can be related to that of Q by the hypothesis that the flood occurrence process is Poissonian. In the proposed model it is assumed, as an exploratory attempt, that a and u(a) are gamma and Weibull distributed, respectively. The model was applied to the annual flood series of eight gauged basins in Basilicata (southern Italy) with catchment areas ranging from 40 to 1600 km(2). The results showed strong physical consistence as the parameters tended to assume values in good agreement with well-consolidated geomorphologic knowledge and suggested a new key to understanding the climatic control of the probability distribution of floods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available