4.7 Article

Biological monitoring of standardized exposure to ethylbenzene: evaluation of a biological tolerance (BAT) value

Journal

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 12, Pages 632-640

Publisher

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002040050018

Keywords

standardized exposures; MAK value; biological monitoring; ethylbenzene in blood; mandelic and phenylglyoxylic acid in urine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of standardized 8 h lasting exposures of n = 18 volunteers to ethylbenzene (EthBz) at levels of 25 and 100% of the maximum allowable concentrations at the workplace (MAK) value of 100 ppm as well as the results of field studies are considered to evaluate a biological tolerance (BAT) value for EthBz. On the basis of the relationship between the external and internal exposure a BAT value of 1.5 mg/l has been set for the EthBz concentration in blood as the most sensitive and specific parameter of exposure to this aromatic hydrocarbon. The interpretation of EthBz blood values has to take into account the short half-life of t(1/2) = 0.5 +/- 0.08 h in the first hour after the end of exposure in which this aromatic hydrocarbon is eliminated from the blood. The additional determination of the EthBz metabolites mandelic acid (MA) and phenylglyoxylic acid (PGA), respectively, excreted in post shift urine as well as in urine samples at the beginning of the next shift shows good correlations with the external exposure. The biological half-life of MA was calculated to t(1/2) = 5.3 +/- 1.1 h, Because the time of sampling can vary the relationship between the levels of MA to PGA the total concentration of the excreted metabolites depends less on this influence and is therefore better suited for monitoring exposed persons. On the basis of the standardized experiments a BAT value has been proposed of 2 g MA plus PCA corrected per gram creatinine. Both BAT values are adjusted to data which result from earlier standardized exposures during 30 min to EthBz under physical activity of 50 watt on a bicycle ergometer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available