4.4 Article

Effect of age on response to zafirlukast in patients with asthma in the Accolate Clinical Experience and Pharmacoepidemiology Trial (ACCEPT)

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 217-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62759-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Accolate Clinical Experience and Pharmacoepidemiology Trial (ACCEPT), evaluated zafirlukast in a wide spectrum of patients from a variety of clinical practices. Objective: To determine the effect of age on the response to zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily in 3759 patients with mild, moderate, or severe asthma. Methods: Patients received open-label administration of zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily (bid) for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function was measured twice daily, and overall asthma symptom scores, number of nighttime awakenings, severity of morning asthma symptoms, and beta(2)-agonist use were recorded daily. Trial results were analyzed to compare the efficacy of zafirlukast in 263 adolescent (12 to 17 years old), 2602 adult (18 to 65 years old), and 321 elderly (66 years old and older) patients (the evaluable population). Results: After 4 weeks of zafirlukast therapy, improvements in pulmonary function decreased with age and were significant for all measures in adolescents and adults and for morning peak expiratory flow in elderly patients. Improvements in symptom response were statistically significant across age groups. Reduction in beta(2)-agonist rescue was similar in adolescents and adults but significantly less in elderly patients. Conclusions: Zafirlukast is an effective treatment for asthma in all patients, regardless of age. In elderly patients, improvement in asthma symptoms rather than pulmonary function may represent a primary marker for efficacy with zafirlukast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available