4.6 Article

Bovine hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC-201) for resuscitation of uncontrolled, exsanguinating liver injury in swine

Journal

SHOCK
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 152-159

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00024382-200013020-00010

Keywords

hemorrhagic shock; traumatic shock; blood substitutes; abdominal injuries; wounds and injuries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the setting of rapidly exsanguinating hemorrhage, resuscitation with intravenous (i.v.) crystalloid solution may not sustain survival before: availability of allogenic blood transfusion and surgery. This study tested the hypothesis that bovine hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier, HBOC-201, would improve resuscitation and extend early survival from exsanguinating hemorrhage. This study simulated the prehospital scenario of rapidly exsanguinating hemorrhage with prolonged prehospital time and lack of blood availability. Severe hemorrhagic shock was induced in swine by using multiple liver lacerations. At 9 min after the onset of bleeding, swine were randomized to receive approximately 10 mL/kg/min of i.v. lactated Ringer's solution (n = 10) or HBOC-201 (n = 7) to achieve a mean aortic pressure (MAP) of 60 mmHg. Thereafter, infusion rate was adjusted to maintain MAP at 60 mmHg for up to 2 h. All animals were initially successfully resuscitated. The results showed 2-h survival was 1 of 10 with lactated Ringer's and 7 of 7 with HBOC-201 (P = 0.0004). Nine lactated Ringer's swine had cardiovascular collapse at 36 rt 10 min. Lactate at 30 min was 18 +/- 3 mmol/L with lactated Ringer's and 12 +/- 2 mmol/L with HBOC-201 (P < 0.05). Hematocrit was < 1% in 9 of 10 lactated Ringer's and 6 of 7 HBOC-201 animals. These data indicate that HBOC-201 improved early survival and stabilized hemodynamic and metabolic parameters vs. lactated Ringer's in this swine model of liver injury with uncontrolled, lethal hemorrhage that simulates the prehospital care environment where allogenic blood is unavailable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available