4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Chronic stress induces the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat brain cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 785-791

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.740785.x

Keywords

immobilization; inducible nitric oxide synthase; peroxynitrite; stress-induced neurodegeneration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term exposure to stress has detrimental effects on several brain functions in many species, including humans, and leads to neurodegenerative changes. However, the underlying neural mechanisms by which stress causes neurodegeneration are still unknown. We have investigated the role of endogenously released nitric oxide (NO) in this phenomenon and the possible induction of the inducible NO synthase (iNOS) isoform, In adult male rats, stress (immobilization for 6 h during 21 days) increases the activity of a calcium-independent, NO synthase and induces the expression of iNOS in cortical neurons as seen by immunohistochemical and western blot analysis. Three weeks of repeated immobilization increases immunoreactivity for nitrotyrosine, a nitration product of peroxynitrite. Repeated stress causes accumulation of the NO metabolites NO2- + NO3- (NOx-) accumulation in cortex, and these changes occur in parallel with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and impairment of glutamate uptake in synaptosomes. Administration of the selective iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine (400 mg/kg i.p. daily from days 7 to 21 of stress) prevents NOx- accumulation in cortex, LDH release, and impairment of glutamate uptake in synaptosomes, Taken together, these findings indicate that a sustained overproduction of NO via iNOS expression maybe responsible, at least in part, for some of the neurodegenerative changes caused by stress and support a possible neuroprotective role for specific iNOS inhibitors in this situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available